In vivo bioluminescence imaging in preclinical trials of genetic vaccines
Author: Petkov, Stefan
Date: 2018-01-19
Location: Atrium, Nobels väg 12 B, Karolinska Institutet, Solna
Time: 09.00
Department: Inst för mikrobiologi, tumör- och cellbiologi / Dept of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology
View/ Open:
Thesis (3.449Mb)
Abstract
DNA immunization is a rapidly developing vaccine platform for infectious diseases, cancer and allergies. The efficiency of DNA vaccination is largely determined by the efficiency of delivery and subsequent expression of genes encoding microbial and tumor antigens or allergens in the cells of vaccine recipients. DNA immunogens are generally administered by intramuscular or intradermal injections, followed by electroporation to enhance the DNA uptake into the cells. An intense debate on the pros and cons of different routes of DNA delivery is still ongoing.
The aim of this work was to develop in vivo imaging applications for improvement of DNA immunization. The first aim was to optimize delivery techniques in order to increase the efficacy of in vivo delivery of DNA vaccines and subsequent immune response. Using model DNA immunogens encoding luciferase, and HIV-derived immunogens encoding protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT), we defined the differences in the strength and type of immune responses induced by them when administered by intradermal or intramuscular injection routes followed by electroporation. Furthermore, we determined the extent to which the method of DNA delivery influences the immune response to Th1 and Th2 type immunogens, represented by plasmids encoding PR and RT of HIV-1. Finally, we developed imaging applications for the in vivo assessment of the effector/lytic potential of the immune response in tumor and surrogate pathogen challenge models.
We immunized mice with DNA immunogens mixed with a gene encoding a bioluminescent reporter. Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) served as a tool to monitor the expression of delivered reporter genes in vivo. By combining the readouts form BLI and immunoassays we defined a set of delivery parameters that led to the best immunization outcome in terms of both immunogen expression and subsequent immune response. After optimizing the delivery conditions we tested different immunization routes to determine the one that ensures maximal immunogenicity of DNA immunogen. Here we show that intradermal administration resulted in a significant enhancement of both cellular and humoral immune responses as compared to intramuscular delivery. This was evident regardless of the nature of the immunogen (Th1 vs. Th2). The kinetics of the loss of co-delivered reporter gene expression was found to correlate with the antigen-specific production of IFN-γ and IL-2 and could thus be used as in vivo correlate of the strength of specific immune responses. Thus, non-invasive imaging allowed to assess the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines in vivo. Using the same parameters we developed a surrogate method that could assess effector memory responses. Finally, we applied BLI to study the growth of luciferase-labeled tumors in luciferase-immunized animals, which provided a functional measure of vaccine efficacy.
Overall, the use of BLI allowed us to establish a methodology to increase the efficacy of delivery, define optimal regimens and test the effector capacity of the immune response induced by DNA vaccination. The application of this technique made it possible to significantly refine and reduce animal experimentation in gene vaccine development.
The aim of this work was to develop in vivo imaging applications for improvement of DNA immunization. The first aim was to optimize delivery techniques in order to increase the efficacy of in vivo delivery of DNA vaccines and subsequent immune response. Using model DNA immunogens encoding luciferase, and HIV-derived immunogens encoding protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT), we defined the differences in the strength and type of immune responses induced by them when administered by intradermal or intramuscular injection routes followed by electroporation. Furthermore, we determined the extent to which the method of DNA delivery influences the immune response to Th1 and Th2 type immunogens, represented by plasmids encoding PR and RT of HIV-1. Finally, we developed imaging applications for the in vivo assessment of the effector/lytic potential of the immune response in tumor and surrogate pathogen challenge models.
We immunized mice with DNA immunogens mixed with a gene encoding a bioluminescent reporter. Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) served as a tool to monitor the expression of delivered reporter genes in vivo. By combining the readouts form BLI and immunoassays we defined a set of delivery parameters that led to the best immunization outcome in terms of both immunogen expression and subsequent immune response. After optimizing the delivery conditions we tested different immunization routes to determine the one that ensures maximal immunogenicity of DNA immunogen. Here we show that intradermal administration resulted in a significant enhancement of both cellular and humoral immune responses as compared to intramuscular delivery. This was evident regardless of the nature of the immunogen (Th1 vs. Th2). The kinetics of the loss of co-delivered reporter gene expression was found to correlate with the antigen-specific production of IFN-γ and IL-2 and could thus be used as in vivo correlate of the strength of specific immune responses. Thus, non-invasive imaging allowed to assess the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines in vivo. Using the same parameters we developed a surrogate method that could assess effector memory responses. Finally, we applied BLI to study the growth of luciferase-labeled tumors in luciferase-immunized animals, which provided a functional measure of vaccine efficacy.
Overall, the use of BLI allowed us to establish a methodology to increase the efficacy of delivery, define optimal regimens and test the effector capacity of the immune response induced by DNA vaccination. The application of this technique made it possible to significantly refine and reduce animal experimentation in gene vaccine development.
List of papers:
I. Petkov S, Heuts F, Krotova O, Kilpeläinen A, Engström G, Starodubova E, Isaguliants M. Evaluation of immunogen delivery by DNA immunization using non-invasive bioluminescence imaging. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013, Oct; 9(10): 2228-2236.
Fulltext (DOI)
Pubmed
View record in Web of Science®
II. Baklaushev VP, Kilpeläinen A, Petkov S, Abakumov MA, Grinenko NF, Yusubalieva GM, Latanova A, Gubskiy IL, Zabozlaev FG, Starodubova ES, Abakumova TO, Isaguliants MG & Chekhonin VP. Luciferase Expression Allows Bioluminescence Imaging But Imposes Limitations on the Orthotopic Mouse (4T1) Model of Breast Cancer. Sci Rep. 2017, 7(1):7715.
Fulltext (DOI)
Pubmed
View record in Web of Science®
III. Petkov S, Latanova A, Starodubova E, Kilpeläinen A, Isaguliants M. Expression localization determines the level of expression and the strength but not the type of immune responses to DNA immunogens in mice. [Submitted]
IV. Latanova A, Petkov S, Kilpeläinen A, Jansons J, Latyshev OE, Kuzmenko YV, Hinkula J, Abakumov MA, Valuev-Elliston VT, Gomelsky M, Karpov VL, Chiodi F, Wahren B, Logunov DY, Starodubova ES, Isaguliants MG. Multiparametric optimization of DNA-immunization furthers a strong Th2-polarized immune response against the wild-type and drug-resistant variants of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. [Submitted]
I. Petkov S, Heuts F, Krotova O, Kilpeläinen A, Engström G, Starodubova E, Isaguliants M. Evaluation of immunogen delivery by DNA immunization using non-invasive bioluminescence imaging. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013, Oct; 9(10): 2228-2236.
Fulltext (DOI)
Pubmed
View record in Web of Science®
II. Baklaushev VP, Kilpeläinen A, Petkov S, Abakumov MA, Grinenko NF, Yusubalieva GM, Latanova A, Gubskiy IL, Zabozlaev FG, Starodubova ES, Abakumova TO, Isaguliants MG & Chekhonin VP. Luciferase Expression Allows Bioluminescence Imaging But Imposes Limitations on the Orthotopic Mouse (4T1) Model of Breast Cancer. Sci Rep. 2017, 7(1):7715.
Fulltext (DOI)
Pubmed
View record in Web of Science®
III. Petkov S, Latanova A, Starodubova E, Kilpeläinen A, Isaguliants M. Expression localization determines the level of expression and the strength but not the type of immune responses to DNA immunogens in mice. [Submitted]
IV. Latanova A, Petkov S, Kilpeläinen A, Jansons J, Latyshev OE, Kuzmenko YV, Hinkula J, Abakumov MA, Valuev-Elliston VT, Gomelsky M, Karpov VL, Chiodi F, Wahren B, Logunov DY, Starodubova ES, Isaguliants MG. Multiparametric optimization of DNA-immunization furthers a strong Th2-polarized immune response against the wild-type and drug-resistant variants of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. [Submitted]
Institution: Karolinska Institutet
Supervisor: Isaguliants, Maria
Co-supervisor: Wahren, Britta; Belikov, Sergey
Issue date: 2017-12-15
Rights:
Publication year: 2017
ISBN: 978-91-7676-926-3
Statistics
Total Visits
Views | |
---|---|
In ...(legacy) | 321 |
In ... | 268 |
Total Visits Per Month
November 2023 | December 2023 | January 2024 | February 2024 | March 2024 | April 2024 | May 2024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In ... | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 |
File Visits
Views | |
---|---|
Thesis_Stefan_Petkov.pdf | 425 |
Thesis_Stefan_Petkov.pdf(legacy) | 223 |
null(legacy) | 1 |
null(legacy) | 1 |
Top country views
Views | |
---|---|
United States | 171 |
Sweden | 92 |
Germany | 60 |
China | 47 |
Russia | 19 |
France | 15 |
Ireland | 11 |
South Korea | 10 |
United Kingdom | 9 |
Austria | 8 |
Top cities views
Views | |
---|---|
Ashburn | 46 |
Woodbridge | 21 |
Beijing | 16 |
Lane | 14 |
Menlo Park | 9 |
Wilmington | 9 |
Dublin | 8 |
Houston | 8 |
Vienna | 8 |
Moscow | 7 |