Colorectal cancer treatment and early response evaluation : how do we best evaluate treatment response?
Author: Byström, Per
Date: 2010-02-26
Location: Föreläsningssalen, Radiumhemmet
Time: 09.30
Department: Institutionen för onkologi-patologi / Department of Oncology-Pathology
View/ Open:
thesis.pdf (1.221Mb)
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common, being responsible for around 12% of
new cancers in Sweden, and contributing heavily to the large numbers of
cancer deaths yearly. CRC is the second most common cause of cancer death
not only in Sweden but also worldwide.
In a large (n=567) multicentre, phase III study, the Nordic VI study, two different ways of giving 5-FU, bolus (FLv) and protracted infusion (Lv5FU2), together with irinotecan, in patients with metastatic (m)CRC was tested without any differences in progression-free survival (PFS) [9 months] or overall survival (OS) [19 months]. Fewer objective responses were seen in the FLIRI group (35% versus 49%, p = 0.001), but the metastatic resection rate did not differ (4% versus 6%, p = 0.3).
In the same study a subset (n=51) of the population was evaluated for early metabolic treatment response with [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). The mean baseline standard uptake value (SUV) for all tumor lesions per patient was higher in non-responders than in responders (mean 7.4 versus 5.6, p = 0.02). There was a strong correlation between metabolic response (changes in SUV) and objective response (p = 0.00001), with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 76%. There was no significant correlation between metabolic response and PFS (P = 0.5) or OS (p = 0.1).
In the Nordic VI study, selected tumor markers at baseline and during treatment were evaluated for their ability to predict response rate (RR), PFS and OS in two sub-studies. In the first one (n=90), low levels of tissue inhibitor of metallo-protease 1 (TIMP-1) levels at baseline were correlated to a higher probability of obtaining an objective response (P =0.007). Plasma TIMP-1scored as a continuous variable on a log scale (loge) was significantly associated with OS (P < 0.0001) and PFS (p =0.048).In the second sub-study (n=106) a significant correlation to OS was seen for baseline levels of all selected markers. In multivariate analyses with clinical parameters, TPA, CRP, SAA and TIMP-1 provided independent information. Changes during treatment, recorded as the slope gave with the exception of CA19-9 for OS less information about outcomes. The best correlation to response was seen for CEA, CA19-9 and TPA with AUC values of 0.78, 0.83 and 0.79, respectively, using a combined model based upon an interaction between the slope and the baseline value.
Health related quality of life (HRQoL) was also evaluated in a subset of the Nordic VI population (n=220). There were no differences in HRQoL between the two treatment groups at any time point. Emotional functioning and pain improved, and diarrhea worsened with time. Most baseline QoL subscales correlated with OS. Independent information on OS, but not PFS or RR was seen for physical functioning (p=.000), appetite (p=.028) and constipation (p=.041) together with hemoglobin level. A summary score, based on the sum of all scale items, was independently related to OS (p=.000) and PFS (p=.006) but not to RR. Most patients with an objective tumor response or a long (≥ 4 months) disease stabilisation had a favourable HRQoL outcome; however, a minor portion did not. No significant correlations were seen between changes in QoL parameters during treatment and RR, PFS and OS.
In a large (n=567) multicentre, phase III study, the Nordic VI study, two different ways of giving 5-FU, bolus (FLv) and protracted infusion (Lv5FU2), together with irinotecan, in patients with metastatic (m)CRC was tested without any differences in progression-free survival (PFS) [9 months] or overall survival (OS) [19 months]. Fewer objective responses were seen in the FLIRI group (35% versus 49%, p = 0.001), but the metastatic resection rate did not differ (4% versus 6%, p = 0.3).
In the same study a subset (n=51) of the population was evaluated for early metabolic treatment response with [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). The mean baseline standard uptake value (SUV) for all tumor lesions per patient was higher in non-responders than in responders (mean 7.4 versus 5.6, p = 0.02). There was a strong correlation between metabolic response (changes in SUV) and objective response (p = 0.00001), with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 76%. There was no significant correlation between metabolic response and PFS (P = 0.5) or OS (p = 0.1).
In the Nordic VI study, selected tumor markers at baseline and during treatment were evaluated for their ability to predict response rate (RR), PFS and OS in two sub-studies. In the first one (n=90), low levels of tissue inhibitor of metallo-protease 1 (TIMP-1) levels at baseline were correlated to a higher probability of obtaining an objective response (P =0.007). Plasma TIMP-1scored as a continuous variable on a log scale (loge) was significantly associated with OS (P < 0.0001) and PFS (p =0.048).In the second sub-study (n=106) a significant correlation to OS was seen for baseline levels of all selected markers. In multivariate analyses with clinical parameters, TPA, CRP, SAA and TIMP-1 provided independent information. Changes during treatment, recorded as the slope gave with the exception of CA19-9 for OS less information about outcomes. The best correlation to response was seen for CEA, CA19-9 and TPA with AUC values of 0.78, 0.83 and 0.79, respectively, using a combined model based upon an interaction between the slope and the baseline value.
Health related quality of life (HRQoL) was also evaluated in a subset of the Nordic VI population (n=220). There were no differences in HRQoL between the two treatment groups at any time point. Emotional functioning and pain improved, and diarrhea worsened with time. Most baseline QoL subscales correlated with OS. Independent information on OS, but not PFS or RR was seen for physical functioning (p=.000), appetite (p=.028) and constipation (p=.041) together with hemoglobin level. A summary score, based on the sum of all scale items, was independently related to OS (p=.000) and PFS (p=.006) but not to RR. Most patients with an objective tumor response or a long (≥ 4 months) disease stabilisation had a favourable HRQoL outcome; however, a minor portion did not. No significant correlations were seen between changes in QoL parameters during treatment and RR, PFS and OS.
List of papers:
I. Glimelius B, Sørbye H, Balteskard L, Byström P, Pfeiffer P, Tveit K, Heikkilä R, Keldsen N, Albertsson M, Starkhammar H, Garmo H, Berglund A (2008). "A randomized phase III multicenter trial comparing irinotecan in combination with the Nordic bolus 5-FU and folinic acid schedule or the bolus/infused de Gramont schedule (Lv5FU2) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer." Ann Oncol 19(5): 909-14. Epub 2008 Jan 21
Pubmed
II. Byström P, Berglund A, Garske U, Jacobsson H, Sundin A, Nygren P, Frödin JE, Glimelius B (2009). "Early prediction of response to first-line chemotherapy by sequential [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced colorectal cancer." Ann Oncol 20(6): 1057-61. Epub 2009 Jan 22
Pubmed
III. Sørensen NM, Byström P, Christensen IJ, Berglund A, Nielsen HJ, Brünner N, Glimelius B (2007). "TIMP-1 is significantly associated with objective response and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving combination of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid." Clin Cancer Res 13(14): 4117-22
Pubmed
IV. Byström P, Berglund Å, Nygren P, Wernroth L, Johansson B, Larsson A, Glimelius B (2010). "Evaluation of predictive markers for patients with advanced colo-rectal cancer." (Manuscript)
V. Byström P, Johansson B, Bergström I, Berglund Å, Sørbye H, Tveit KM, Glimelius B (2010). "Health-related Quality of Life as therapeutic guidance in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving palliative combination chemotherapy." (Manuscript)
I. Glimelius B, Sørbye H, Balteskard L, Byström P, Pfeiffer P, Tveit K, Heikkilä R, Keldsen N, Albertsson M, Starkhammar H, Garmo H, Berglund A (2008). "A randomized phase III multicenter trial comparing irinotecan in combination with the Nordic bolus 5-FU and folinic acid schedule or the bolus/infused de Gramont schedule (Lv5FU2) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer." Ann Oncol 19(5): 909-14. Epub 2008 Jan 21
Pubmed
II. Byström P, Berglund A, Garske U, Jacobsson H, Sundin A, Nygren P, Frödin JE, Glimelius B (2009). "Early prediction of response to first-line chemotherapy by sequential [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced colorectal cancer." Ann Oncol 20(6): 1057-61. Epub 2009 Jan 22
Pubmed
III. Sørensen NM, Byström P, Christensen IJ, Berglund A, Nielsen HJ, Brünner N, Glimelius B (2007). "TIMP-1 is significantly associated with objective response and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving combination of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid." Clin Cancer Res 13(14): 4117-22
Pubmed
IV. Byström P, Berglund Å, Nygren P, Wernroth L, Johansson B, Larsson A, Glimelius B (2010). "Evaluation of predictive markers for patients with advanced colo-rectal cancer." (Manuscript)
V. Byström P, Johansson B, Bergström I, Berglund Å, Sørbye H, Tveit KM, Glimelius B (2010). "Health-related Quality of Life as therapeutic guidance in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving palliative combination chemotherapy." (Manuscript)
Issue date: 2010-02-05
Rights:
Publication year: 2010
ISBN: 978-91-7409-766-5
Statistics
Total Visits
Views | |
---|---|
Colorectal ...(legacy) | 886 |
Colorectal ... | 132 |
Total Visits Per Month
February 2024 | March 2024 | April 2024 | May 2024 | June 2024 | July 2024 | August 2024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colorectal ... | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 2 |
File Visits
Views | |
---|---|
thesis.pdf | 431 |
thesis.pdf(legacy) | 409 |
thesis.pdf.txt(legacy) | 2 |
Top country views
Views | |
---|---|
United States | 398 |
China | 84 |
Sweden | 81 |
Germany | 64 |
Denmark | 37 |
South Korea | 24 |
France | 15 |
United Kingdom | 11 |
Russia | 10 |
India | 9 |
Top cities views
Views | |
---|---|
Romeo | 36 |
Ballerup | 35 |
Sunnyvale | 32 |
Beijing | 22 |
Kiez | 20 |
Seoul | 17 |
Stockholm | 14 |
Shenzhen | 13 |
Nürnberg | 11 |
London | 7 |