Birth centre care : reproduction and infant health
Author: Gottvall, Karin
Date: 2004-04-23
Location: Hörsal 1, Röd, Alfred Nobels allé 23, Huddinge
Time: 9.00
Department: Institutionen Neurobiologi, vårdvetenskap och samhälle / Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society
View/ Open:
Thesis (271.4Kb)
Abstract
This thesis has two general aims, to investigate factors affecting
women s decision to have a second baby and to study the effect of birth
centre care on infant outcome. The specific aims were to investigate 1)
whether birth centre care during a woman s first pregnancy had an effect
on her future reproduction, 2) whether a negative experience of the first
birth had en effect on future reproduction, and 3) whether birth centre
care had an effect on perinatal mortality 4) and on morbidity during the
infant s first month.
Nulliparous women randomly allocated to in-hospital birth centre care (n=505) and to standard maternity care (n=479) in early pregnancy were followed during a period of 7-10 years after the birth. Information about a second birth was collected from the Swedish Medical Birth Register and analysed by the Kaplan Meier method. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of having a second baby and the time to second birth (median: 2.85 versus 2.82 years, log-rank 1.26; p=0.26).
Experience of childbirth was assessed in 617 first-time mothers. Information relating women s global assessment of the birth experience (questionnaire two months postpartum) and various background variables (questionnaire in early pregnancy) was linked to the Swedish Medical Birth Register. Women with a negative experience had fewer subsequent children and a longer interval to the second baby. 38% of women with a negative experience did not have another baby during the following 8 10 years, compared with 17% of those with a less negative experience (p<0.001).
Two studies investigated perinatal mortality and infant morbidity in all women (n=3256) admitted to an in-hospital birth centre from 1989 to 1999. Data were compared with the outcomes for all the other women in the Greater Stockholm who gave birth in standard care during the same period and who met the same medical low-risk criteria as in the birth centre group (n=180 380). Outcome data were collected from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register and medical records. Logistic regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounding background factors.
No statistically significant difference in the overall perinatal mortality rate was found between the birth centre group and the standard care group (OR 1.5; 0.9 2.4), but the infants of primiparas were at higher risk in the birth centre group (OR 2.2; 1.3 3.9). Infants in the birth centre group had a higher risk of respiratory problems (OR 1.5; 1.2 1.8) and a lower risk of clavicle and other fractures (OR 0.4; 0.3 0.6).
In conclusion, birth centre care during a woman s first pregnancy does not appear to affect future reproduction, but a negative overall childbirth experience does. Birth centre care might be associated with a higher risk of perinatal mortality in first-born babies, minor respiratory problems and a lower risk of birth trauma such as fractures. It is important to consider maternal and infant risk factors in the planning of models for childbirth care.
Nulliparous women randomly allocated to in-hospital birth centre care (n=505) and to standard maternity care (n=479) in early pregnancy were followed during a period of 7-10 years after the birth. Information about a second birth was collected from the Swedish Medical Birth Register and analysed by the Kaplan Meier method. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of having a second baby and the time to second birth (median: 2.85 versus 2.82 years, log-rank 1.26; p=0.26).
Experience of childbirth was assessed in 617 first-time mothers. Information relating women s global assessment of the birth experience (questionnaire two months postpartum) and various background variables (questionnaire in early pregnancy) was linked to the Swedish Medical Birth Register. Women with a negative experience had fewer subsequent children and a longer interval to the second baby. 38% of women with a negative experience did not have another baby during the following 8 10 years, compared with 17% of those with a less negative experience (p<0.001).
Two studies investigated perinatal mortality and infant morbidity in all women (n=3256) admitted to an in-hospital birth centre from 1989 to 1999. Data were compared with the outcomes for all the other women in the Greater Stockholm who gave birth in standard care during the same period and who met the same medical low-risk criteria as in the birth centre group (n=180 380). Outcome data were collected from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register and medical records. Logistic regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounding background factors.
No statistically significant difference in the overall perinatal mortality rate was found between the birth centre group and the standard care group (OR 1.5; 0.9 2.4), but the infants of primiparas were at higher risk in the birth centre group (OR 2.2; 1.3 3.9). Infants in the birth centre group had a higher risk of respiratory problems (OR 1.5; 1.2 1.8) and a lower risk of clavicle and other fractures (OR 0.4; 0.3 0.6).
In conclusion, birth centre care during a woman s first pregnancy does not appear to affect future reproduction, but a negative overall childbirth experience does. Birth centre care might be associated with a higher risk of perinatal mortality in first-born babies, minor respiratory problems and a lower risk of birth trauma such as fractures. It is important to consider maternal and infant risk factors in the planning of models for childbirth care.
List of papers:
I. Gottvall K, Waldenstrom U (2002). "Does birth center care during a womans first pregnancy have any impact on her future reproduction?" Birth 29(3): 177-81
Pubmed
II. Gottvall K, Waldenstrom U (2002). "Does a traumatic birth experience have an impact on future reproduction?" BJOG 109(3): 254-60
Pubmed
III. Gottvall K, Grunewald C, Waldenstrom U (2004). "Safety of birth centre care: perinatal mortality over a 10-year period." BJOG 111(1): 71-8
Pubmed
IV. Gottvall K, Winbladh B, Cnattingius S, Waldenström U (2004). "Birth centre care over a 10-years period: infant morbidity during the first month after birth." (Submitted)
View record in Web of Science®
I. Gottvall K, Waldenstrom U (2002). "Does birth center care during a womans first pregnancy have any impact on her future reproduction?" Birth 29(3): 177-81
Pubmed
II. Gottvall K, Waldenstrom U (2002). "Does a traumatic birth experience have an impact on future reproduction?" BJOG 109(3): 254-60
Pubmed
III. Gottvall K, Grunewald C, Waldenstrom U (2004). "Safety of birth centre care: perinatal mortality over a 10-year period." BJOG 111(1): 71-8
Pubmed
IV. Gottvall K, Winbladh B, Cnattingius S, Waldenström U (2004). "Birth centre care over a 10-years period: infant morbidity during the first month after birth." (Submitted)
View record in Web of Science®
Issue date: 2004-04-02
Rights:
Publication year: 2004
ISBN: 91-7349-825-4
Statistics
Total Visits
Views | |
---|---|
Birth ...(legacy) | 667 |
Birth ... | 127 |
Total Visits Per Month
October 2023 | November 2023 | December 2023 | January 2024 | February 2024 | March 2024 | April 2024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Birth ... | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
File Visits
Views | |
---|---|
thesis.pdf(legacy) | 269 |
thesis.pdf | 105 |
thesis.pdf.txt(legacy) | 2 |
Top country views
Views | |
---|---|
United States | 319 |
Sweden | 77 |
China | 55 |
Germany | 50 |
South Korea | 14 |
Russia | 14 |
Finland | 12 |
Singapore | 11 |
United Kingdom | 10 |
Ireland | 10 |
Top cities views
Views | |
---|---|
Sunnyvale | 33 |
Romeo | 29 |
Beijing | 20 |
Kiez | 19 |
Seoul | 14 |
Stockholm | 13 |
Shenzhen | 11 |
Singapore | 11 |
Dublin | 9 |
London | 8 |