Interprofessional education : aspects on learning together on an interprofessional training ward
Author: Hylin, Uffe
Date: 2010-06-11
Location: Aulan, Södersjukhuset
Time: 09.00
Department: Institutionen för klinisk forskning och utbildning, Södersjukhuset / Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset
View/ Open:
thesis.pdf (1.209Mb)
Abstract
In this thesis, students from four different educational programmes, i.e.
medicine, nursing, occupational therapy and physiotherapy, participated
in the studies. The students had two-week placements on an
interprofessional training ward (IPTW), where they worked together in
teams. The goals were in short to learn about and understand the other
professions, to develop one s own professional role and to provide the
patients with good care.
This thesis is based on four studies. Study I is a descriptive study in which students from the four professions were asked for their opinions about the course in relation to the goals of the course, e.g. how they perceived their professional role and what knowledge they had about the other professions. Study II is a follow-up study in which the students who had completed their course at the IPTW two years earlier were asked for their impressions of the course in relation to their experience of working as professionals, e.g. if they encouraged collaboration in their present occupation. In Study III the students approaches to learning were explored and related to their opinions about the course. Study IV is a prospective controlled intervention study investigating the impact on teamwork and learning of a one-day team building training preceding the course at the IPTW. Data was collected by questionnaires and observations.
The results from Study I showed that most students perceived their professional roles more clearly, that their knowledge about other professions had increased, and that they rated the educational concept at the IPTW high. In Study II the students described independence and responsibility as concepts unique to the IPTW. The collaborative learning methods made their self-confidence grow, but the supervision could be improved. Study III showed that the students in general preferred a collaborative-constructivist approach to learning, but one cluster called Low collaborative could be identified, and the students in this cluster were less positive towards the IPTW concept than the other students. In Study IV the students in the intervention group had a more positive approach to teamwork and communicated better during the course. It was easier for the facilitators to work with the intervention teams.
Clinical practice on an IPTW provides students with a good opportunity to develop their own professional roles and learn about the other professions. Students value the interprofessional training in clinical practice high. Former students use the experience they have acquired from the course in their present work. Students with a lowcollaborative profile in their approach to learning may find interprofessional training less important than other students. Team-building training improves teamwork and collaboration. Students prefer clinical training on an IPTW compared to traditional clinical practice.
This thesis is based on four studies. Study I is a descriptive study in which students from the four professions were asked for their opinions about the course in relation to the goals of the course, e.g. how they perceived their professional role and what knowledge they had about the other professions. Study II is a follow-up study in which the students who had completed their course at the IPTW two years earlier were asked for their impressions of the course in relation to their experience of working as professionals, e.g. if they encouraged collaboration in their present occupation. In Study III the students approaches to learning were explored and related to their opinions about the course. Study IV is a prospective controlled intervention study investigating the impact on teamwork and learning of a one-day team building training preceding the course at the IPTW. Data was collected by questionnaires and observations.
The results from Study I showed that most students perceived their professional roles more clearly, that their knowledge about other professions had increased, and that they rated the educational concept at the IPTW high. In Study II the students described independence and responsibility as concepts unique to the IPTW. The collaborative learning methods made their self-confidence grow, but the supervision could be improved. Study III showed that the students in general preferred a collaborative-constructivist approach to learning, but one cluster called Low collaborative could be identified, and the students in this cluster were less positive towards the IPTW concept than the other students. In Study IV the students in the intervention group had a more positive approach to teamwork and communicated better during the course. It was easier for the facilitators to work with the intervention teams.
Clinical practice on an IPTW provides students with a good opportunity to develop their own professional roles and learn about the other professions. Students value the interprofessional training in clinical practice high. Former students use the experience they have acquired from the course in their present work. Students with a lowcollaborative profile in their approach to learning may find interprofessional training less important than other students. Team-building training improves teamwork and collaboration. Students prefer clinical training on an IPTW compared to traditional clinical practice.
List of papers:
I. Ponzer S, Hylin U, Kusoffsky A, Lauffs M, Lonka K, Mattiasson AC, Nordström G (2004). "Interprofessional training in the context of clinical practice: goals and students perceptions on clinical education wards." Med Educ 38(7): 727-36
Pubmed
II. Hylin U, Nyholm H, Mattiasson AC, Ponzer S (2007). "Interprofessional training in clinical practice on a training ward for healthcare students: a two-year follow-up." J Interprof Care 21(3): 277-88
Pubmed
III. Hylin U, Lonka K, Ponzer S (2010). "Students approaches to learning in clinical interprofessional context." (Submitted)
IV. Hylin U, Kalén S, Longueville A, Hjälm M, Ponzer S (2010). "Does team building training enhance interprofessional collaboration at a training ward? A prospective intervention study." (Submitted)
I. Ponzer S, Hylin U, Kusoffsky A, Lauffs M, Lonka K, Mattiasson AC, Nordström G (2004). "Interprofessional training in the context of clinical practice: goals and students perceptions on clinical education wards." Med Educ 38(7): 727-36
Pubmed
II. Hylin U, Nyholm H, Mattiasson AC, Ponzer S (2007). "Interprofessional training in clinical practice on a training ward for healthcare students: a two-year follow-up." J Interprof Care 21(3): 277-88
Pubmed
III. Hylin U, Lonka K, Ponzer S (2010). "Students approaches to learning in clinical interprofessional context." (Submitted)
IV. Hylin U, Kalén S, Longueville A, Hjälm M, Ponzer S (2010). "Does team building training enhance interprofessional collaboration at a training ward? A prospective intervention study." (Submitted)
Issue date: 2010-05-21
Rights:
Publication year: 2010
ISBN: 978-91-7409-906-5
Statistics
Total Visits
Views | |
---|---|
Interprofessional ...(legacy) | 1438 |
Interprofessional ... | 287 |
Total Visits Per Month
October 2023 | November 2023 | December 2023 | January 2024 | February 2024 | March 2024 | April 2024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interprofessional ... | 5 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
File Visits
Views | |
---|---|
thesis.pdf(legacy) | 3927 |
thesis.pdf | 1859 |
thesis.pdf.txt(legacy) | 2 |
Top country views
Views | |
---|---|
United States | 483 |
Sweden | 354 |
Germany | 99 |
South Korea | 67 |
China | 62 |
Finland | 58 |
Ireland | 42 |
United Kingdom | 34 |
Denmark | 17 |
Russia | 12 |
Top cities views
Views | |
---|---|
Stockholm | 69 |
Dublin | 41 |
Seoul | 41 |
Sunnyvale | 41 |
Romeo | 39 |
Dallas | 38 |
Beijing | 26 |
Lidingö | 23 |
Daejeon | 21 |
Kiez | 21 |