Sedation with volatile anesthetics in cardiothoracic intensive care unit patients
Volatile anaesthetics have been reported to provide protection against myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury. This effect has been demonstrated in experimental studies when the volatile anaesthetics were provided either before (preconditioning) or after the ischemic period (postconditioning). Clinical trials of volatile anaesthetics versus intravenous anaesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have reported reduced postoperative release of troponin, a biomarker of myocardial necrosis. The most pronounced reduction was achieved when sevoflurane was administered throughout surgery. Hence, it could be of interest to investigate whether additional myocardial protection could be achieved in cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) patients following CABG by prolonging administration of volatile anaesthetics to include the period of routine postoperative sedation.
The AnaConDa® is an anaesthetic conserving device that enables sedation with isoflurane or sevoflurane with common ICU ventilators. This method has been demonstrated to be feasible for sedation during mechanical ventilation in the general ICU. Isoflurane has also been used clinically to provide inhaled sedation during therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest, but there are no evaluations or publications of this treatment. The AnaConDa® requires scavenging of volatile anaesthetics in expired breathing air. The use of an adsorbing canister with the filtered air released in the ICU room has not been well described.
The aim of this thesis was to investigate clinical and occupational aspects of inhaled sedation with volatile anaesthetics in cardiothoracic ICU patients. We conducted a randomized clinical trial of short-term sevoflurane sedation versus propofol following CABG. While no significant differences were found in cardiac adverse events or troponin-T values sampled 12 hours following surgery, a reduced change from pre- to postoperative troponin-T values was demonstrated in a post-hoc analysis. Wake-up times were shorter in the sevoflurane-sedated group, but did not affect ICU or hospital stay in our short-term sedation. While sevoflurane-sedated patients were able to follow verbal command earlier, memories assessed with the validated ICU-Memory Tool were similar after sedation.
In a retrospective study of isoflurane sedation during therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest, it appeared that the early neurologic assessment with the Glasgow Coma Scale performed within 24 hours from reaching normal body temperature was consistent with the conventional assessment following 72 hours. We conducted an observational study of occupational exposure to sevoflurane during its use to provide sedation in the ICU and demonstrated that passive scavenging with an adsorbing canister (CONTRAfluran™) provided minimal exposure to sevoflurane compared to no scavenging. Nurses in both groups had exposures below the Swedish occupational exposure limit, but only nurses working with patients without scavenging reported adverse symptoms. Smell of sevoflurane was the most frequent adverse symptom.
List of scientific papers
I. Hellström J, Öwall A, Bergström J, Sackey V P. Cardiac outcome after sevoflurane versus propofol sedation following coronary bypass surgery: A pilot study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2011; 55:460–467
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02405.x
II. Hellström J, Öwall A, Sackey V P. Wake-up times following sedation with sevoflurane versus propofol after cardiac surgery. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. 2012; 46:262-268
https://doi.org/10.3109/14017431.2012.676209
III. Hellström J, Martling C-R, Öwall A, Sackey V P. Inhaled isoflurane sedation during therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: A Case Series. Critical Care Medicine. 2013; 18 October.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a643d7
IV. Hellström J, Öwall A, Lewné M, Sackey V P. (2013). Ambient sevoflurane concentration during inhaled sedation in the Intensive Care Unit. [Submitted]
History
Defence date
2014-02-14Department
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery
Publisher/Institution
Karolinska InstitutetMain supervisor
Sackey, PeterPublication year
2014Thesis type
- Doctoral thesis
ISBN
978-91-7549-400-5Number of supporting papers
4Language
- eng