Karolinska Institutet
Browse

Neuromechanical control of the spine

thesis
posted on 2024-09-02, 23:41 authored by Paul Hodges

Control of the spine is complex. The spine is inherently unstable and dependent on the contribution of muscles. Yet there is considerable redundancy in the motor system with many muscles that act on the trunk.

This is further complicated by the indirect effects of trunk muscle contraction on the spine, such as increased intraabdominal pressure (IAP), and the multiple functions that must be performed by the trunk muscles such as respiration, in addition to control and movement of the spine. The overall aim of this series of studies was to investigate the control strategies used by the central nervous system (CNS) to control the spine. Studies were conducted to investigate the control of the spine in association with predictable (voluntary arm movements) and unpredictable perturbations (unexpected arm loading and support surface translations) to the trunk. Additional human and porcine studies were conducted to investigate the biomechanical effect on the spine of contraction of the deep trunk muscles that surround the abdominal cavity.

Recordings of electromyographic activity of the trunk muscles were made with intra-muscular electrodes and electrodes placed on the skin or mucosa overlying the muscles. Trunk movement was recorded in three dimensions with markers placed on the skin in human studies or attached to pins inserted into the spinous processes in the porcine studies. IAP was recorded with a pressure transducer inserted via the nose into the stomach. The results provide novel evidence of strategies used by the CNS to control the spine that challenge contemporary views on the mechanisms of control of the spine. A key finding was that the CNS controls the spine using movements rather than simply stiffening the spine. This conflicts with many current models and must be incorporated into biomechanical modelling to understand the mechanisms of control of the spine.

The studies also provided the first in vivo evidence of the effect of IAP on the human spine and provide several arguments for the potential importance of IAP for normal control of the spine. An interesting finding was that tasks may not be coordinated when the demands of multiple functions of the trunk muscles are conflicting. This has potential to compromise normal control of the spine.

In summary, these studies indicate that activity of the deep trunk muscles that surround the abdominal cavity is critical for fine-tuning intervertebral control. Taken together these data have implications not only for the biomechanics and motor control of spinal stability, but also for the management of patients with low back pain.

List of scientific papers

I. Hodges P, Cresswell A, Thorstensson A (1999). Preparatory trunk motion accompanies rapid upper limb movement. Exp Brain Res. 124(1): 69-79.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9928791

II. Hodges PW, Cresswell AG, Daggfeldt K, Thorstensson A (2000). Three dimensional preparatory trunk motion precedes asymmetrical upper limb movement. Gait Posture. 11(2): 92-101.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10899662

III. Hodges PW, Cresswell AG, Thorstensson A (2001). Perturbed upper limb movements cause short-latency postural responses in trunk muscles. Exp Brain Res. 138(2): 243-50.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11417465

IV. Hodges PW, Cresswell AG, Thorstensson A (2003). Intra-abdominal pressure response to multidirectional support-surface translation. [Submitted]

V. Hodges PW, Smith M, Grigorenko A, Cresswell AG, Thorstensson A (2003). Trunk muscle response to support surface translation in sitting: normal control and effects of respiration. [Submitted]

VI. Hodges PW, Cresswell AG, Daggfeldt K, Thorstensson A (2001). In vivo measurement of the effect of intra-abdominal pressure on the human spine. J Biomech. 34(3): 347-53.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11182126

VII. Hodges P, Kaigle Holm A, Holm S Ekstrom L, Cresswell AG, Hanson T, Thorstensson A (2003). Intervertebal stiffness of the spine is increased by evoked contraction of transversus abdominis and the diaphragm: in vivo porcine studies. Spine.

History

Defence date

2003-06-13

Department

  • Department of Neuroscience

Publisher/Institution

Karolinska Institutet

Publication year

2003

Thesis type

  • Doctoral thesis

ISBN-10

91-7349-552-2

Number of supporting papers

7

Language

  • eng

Original publication date

2003-05-23

Author name in thesis

Hodges, Paul

Original department name

Department of Neuroscience

Place of publication

Stockholm

Usage metrics

    Theses

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC