Quality of primary care and self-management of patients with type 2 diabetes in Muscat, Oman
Author: Abdulhadi, Nadia M Noor
Date: 2013-02-12
Location: Rockefeller lecture hall, Nobels väg 11, KI Campus, Solna
Time: 13.00
Department: Inst för folkhälsovetenskap / Dept of Public Health Sciences
Abstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus is the most common non-communicable disease in Oman and its control remains a huge challenge for the health system.
Objectives: The first three studies aimed at exploring how health-care providers interacted with patients with type 2 diabetes at primary health-care level in Muscat, Oman, how the patients perceived these interactions and how the health care providers perceived diabetes care. Study four assessed diabetes self-management, awareness of complications, and attitudes about diabetes management among people living with type 2 diabetes.
Methods: Quantitative and qualitative research methods were used for data collection. Data for study I was collected through direct observations of 175 consultations among doctors and diabetes practice nurses using checklists developed from the National Diabetes Guidelines and other studies of patient-provider interaction. Data for study II was collected through focus group discussions with patients, while face-to-face interviews with providers were conducted in study III. A questionnaire-based survey among patients was used to collect data for study IV. Statistical analyses were used for the quantitative data, while qualitative content analysis was applied for the qualitative data.
Main findings: The interactions between health-care providers and their type 2 diabetes patients were sub-optimal in more than 50 % of consultations and there was poor collaboration between the health care staff working in diabetes care. The quality of the diabetes nurses’ interactions was sub-optimal in 75% of their consultations. The combined scores of all aspects for both doctors and diabetes nurses showed that they interacted optimally with the patients in only one health centre. In sub-study II, the patients expressed their dissatisfaction with issues related to the organization of the diabetes clinics and they perceived the doctors and nurses to be neither experts nor sufficiently competent in diabetes care. Patients expressed their inability to participate in the medical dialogue or communicate their concerns. In sub-study III, organizational barriers and barriers related to patients and health care providers were identified such as: workload; lack of teamwork approach; patients' poor management adherence and influence of culture on their attitudes towards illness; frustration of doctors and nurses due to unsuccessful efforts with the patients and tendency to aggressive behaviour with non-adherent patients. In sub-study IV, 62% of patients had a poor self-management score, while home glucose monitoring was practiced by 38% of patients. Many patients were unaware about how to recognize hypoglycaemia or respond to it, but were good at demonstrating methods to stabilize blood glucose.
Conclusions and recommendations: Clearly defined professional roles and appropriate education to support patients to be able to have a key role in their own care are essential. The role of diabetes nurses should be enhanced. A multidisciplinary team approach and training of the providers to upgrade their skills regarding communication and care with emphasis on patient-centred approach are needed. The findings further reflect the need for changes in professional behaviour towards a less authoritarian style and to recognize cultural influences and the patients' beliefs in order to individualize the care according to patients’ needs. The results can be useful for the policy makers in Oman and countries with similar health systems, for improving the quality of diabetes care and the organizational efficiency of diabetes clinics.
Objectives: The first three studies aimed at exploring how health-care providers interacted with patients with type 2 diabetes at primary health-care level in Muscat, Oman, how the patients perceived these interactions and how the health care providers perceived diabetes care. Study four assessed diabetes self-management, awareness of complications, and attitudes about diabetes management among people living with type 2 diabetes.
Methods: Quantitative and qualitative research methods were used for data collection. Data for study I was collected through direct observations of 175 consultations among doctors and diabetes practice nurses using checklists developed from the National Diabetes Guidelines and other studies of patient-provider interaction. Data for study II was collected through focus group discussions with patients, while face-to-face interviews with providers were conducted in study III. A questionnaire-based survey among patients was used to collect data for study IV. Statistical analyses were used for the quantitative data, while qualitative content analysis was applied for the qualitative data.
Main findings: The interactions between health-care providers and their type 2 diabetes patients were sub-optimal in more than 50 % of consultations and there was poor collaboration between the health care staff working in diabetes care. The quality of the diabetes nurses’ interactions was sub-optimal in 75% of their consultations. The combined scores of all aspects for both doctors and diabetes nurses showed that they interacted optimally with the patients in only one health centre. In sub-study II, the patients expressed their dissatisfaction with issues related to the organization of the diabetes clinics and they perceived the doctors and nurses to be neither experts nor sufficiently competent in diabetes care. Patients expressed their inability to participate in the medical dialogue or communicate their concerns. In sub-study III, organizational barriers and barriers related to patients and health care providers were identified such as: workload; lack of teamwork approach; patients' poor management adherence and influence of culture on their attitudes towards illness; frustration of doctors and nurses due to unsuccessful efforts with the patients and tendency to aggressive behaviour with non-adherent patients. In sub-study IV, 62% of patients had a poor self-management score, while home glucose monitoring was practiced by 38% of patients. Many patients were unaware about how to recognize hypoglycaemia or respond to it, but were good at demonstrating methods to stabilize blood glucose.
Conclusions and recommendations: Clearly defined professional roles and appropriate education to support patients to be able to have a key role in their own care are essential. The role of diabetes nurses should be enhanced. A multidisciplinary team approach and training of the providers to upgrade their skills regarding communication and care with emphasis on patient-centred approach are needed. The findings further reflect the need for changes in professional behaviour towards a less authoritarian style and to recognize cultural influences and the patients' beliefs in order to individualize the care according to patients’ needs. The results can be useful for the policy makers in Oman and countries with similar health systems, for improving the quality of diabetes care and the organizational efficiency of diabetes clinics.
List of papers:
I. Abdulhadi N, Al-Shafaee MA, Östenson CG, Vernby A, Wahlström R. Quality of interaction between primary health-care providers and patients with type 2 diabetes in Muscat, Oman: An observational study. BMC Family Practice. 2006; 7:72.
Fulltext (DOI)
Pubmed
II. Abdulhadi N, Al-Shafaee MA, Freudenthal S, Östenson CG, Wahlström R. Patient-provider interation from the perspectives of type 2 diabetes patients in Muscat, Oman: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 2007; 7:162.
Fulltext (DOI)
Pubmed
View record in Web of Science®
III. Abdulhadi N, Al-Shafaee M, Wahlström R, Hjelm K. Doctors’ and nurses’ views on patient care for type 2 diabetes: an interview study in primary health care in Oman. Primary Health Care Research and Development. 2012 Dec 21:1-12.
Fulltext (DOI)
Pubmed
IV. Elliott J, Abdulhadi N, Al-Maniri AA, Al-Shafaee MA, Wahlström R. Diabetes self-management and education of people living with diabetes: A survey in primary health care in Muscat, Oman. [Submitted]
I. Abdulhadi N, Al-Shafaee MA, Östenson CG, Vernby A, Wahlström R. Quality of interaction between primary health-care providers and patients with type 2 diabetes in Muscat, Oman: An observational study. BMC Family Practice. 2006; 7:72.
Fulltext (DOI)
Pubmed
II. Abdulhadi N, Al-Shafaee MA, Freudenthal S, Östenson CG, Wahlström R. Patient-provider interation from the perspectives of type 2 diabetes patients in Muscat, Oman: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 2007; 7:162.
Fulltext (DOI)
Pubmed
View record in Web of Science®
III. Abdulhadi N, Al-Shafaee M, Wahlström R, Hjelm K. Doctors’ and nurses’ views on patient care for type 2 diabetes: an interview study in primary health care in Oman. Primary Health Care Research and Development. 2012 Dec 21:1-12.
Fulltext (DOI)
Pubmed
IV. Elliott J, Abdulhadi N, Al-Maniri AA, Al-Shafaee MA, Wahlström R. Diabetes self-management and education of people living with diabetes: A survey in primary health care in Muscat, Oman. [Submitted]
Institution: Karolinska Institutet
Supervisor: Rolf Wahlström
Issue date: 2013-01-21
Rights:
Publication year: 2013
ISBN: 978-91-7549-038-0
Statistics
Total Visits
Views | |
---|---|
Quality ...(legacy) | 1066 |
Quality ... | 215 |
Total Visits Per Month
October 2023 | November 2023 | December 2023 | January 2024 | February 2024 | March 2024 | April 2024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality ... | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
File Visits
Views | |
---|---|
Thesis_Nadia_Abdulhadi.pdf(legacy) | 608 |
Spikblad_Nadia_Abdulhadi.pdf(legacy) | 350 |
Thesis_Nadia_Abdulhadi.pdf | 274 |
Spikblad_Nadia_Abdulhadi.pdf | 42 |
Thesis_Nadia_Abdulhadi.pdf.txt(legacy) | 2 |
Spikblad_Nadia_Abdulhadi.pdf.txt(legacy) | 2 |
Top country views
Views | |
---|---|
United States | 496 |
Sweden | 136 |
Germany | 78 |
China | 71 |
South Korea | 52 |
United Kingdom | 42 |
Oman | 31 |
Ireland | 20 |
Egypt | 12 |
Finland | 11 |
Top cities views
Views | |
---|---|
Ashburn | 48 |
Stockholm | 47 |
Sunnyvale | 38 |
Romeo | 35 |
Kiez | 26 |
Daejeon | 23 |
Seoul | 22 |
Beijing | 18 |
Shenzhen | 14 |
London | 11 |